Search Site


A state appellate court has just upheld a DEP decision denying a homeowner’s application to move a pier by six feet from its prior location. The DEP held, and the Court agreed, that moving the pier resulted in its losing its “legacy status” and therefore new, more restrictive rules apply. The case is entitled Dunn v. NJDEP, Appellate Divsion docket number A-1392-22. It is a perfect illustration of how one can lose grandfathering rights and become responsible for new standards.

Dunn purchased waterfront property in Cape May County in 2015. He then applied to the NJDEP to make certain property improvements, and DEP authorized those improvements. But after the construction was completed, Dunn applied for a permit to reflect the fact that the pier had been moved. In other words, he applied to “legalize” the work he had undertaken without approval. That’s where his problems began.

DEP denied the permit to legalize the pier relocation because new regulations require that the pier be no greater than eight feet wide. His was 13 feet. His neighbor participated in the administrative action opposing the grant of the permit, and we see that kind of participation often, particularly in the state’s coastal region.

The Court found that the DEP’s reasoning to be supported by the substantial history underlying the application statutory and regulatory provisions at issue. In fact, the Court referred to the regulatory requirement that piers not be rebuilt greater than eight feet in width as clear on its face. Hence in this case, thirteen feet is clearly greater that eight feet, and the Court uphelp the denial by DEP.

Clearly our waterfront in NJ is heavily regulated and controlled –and for good reason. People need to ensure that any improvements meet the letter of the law. Here, while Mr. Dunn was done, you do not want that to happen to you.

Our Attorneys
What clients are saying about us
  • "I highly recommend this law firm because they were responsive and sensitive to my needs and won. I chose this firm after having talked to 6 other firms because within minutes of contacting them I was able to speak to Mr. Lieberman himself. Mr. Lieberman and the junior attorneys did not make me feel small just because I am an individual, a mother, and not a big corporation. My phone calls & emails were returned promptly. They listened to exactly what I wanted & delivered. The defendant was nasty and ignored us and at times I felt like this was going nowhere. The attorneys worked well to reach a settlement that exceeded my expectations. Mr. Lieberman is a very seasoned lawyer who has compassion for his clients. The best thing about Mr. Lieberman is that he trains his staff to have that same level of compassion and respect for clients. " - Z.B., Jersey City, NJ

  • "I would like to personally thank Lieberman & Blecher for their help and advice to my family in dealing with an environmental cleanup issue. When it is a big company and their legal team against a small property owner, I have learned that you need an expert to protect your property and your rights. The team at Lieberman & Blecher did this for my family in a professional and cost effective manner. I would certainly recommend this firm to anyone in need of legal assistance" - C.K., Woodbridge, NJ

Contact The Toxic Injury Lawyers

Quick Contact Form