Search Site

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Federal CERCLA Does Not Supersede State Statute of Repose

In CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014), the Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that the federal Superfund law, also known as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), does not supersede a state law in North Carolina that requires lawsuits to be brought within 10 years from the date that contamination occurred. 

The case concerned groundwater pollution at a former electronics manufacturing facility in Asheville, North Carolina.  Approximately two dozen nearby landowners were seeking damages and remediation after discovering significantly elevated levels of carcinogens in the groundwater.  The contamination was discovered in the results of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency tests taken in 2009, which made it clear that the contaminated water could cause liver and kidney damage, heart ailments, and cancer. 

However, CTS Corp. sold the property upon which they operated and contaminated in 1987.  Therefore, the lawsuit was barred by North Carolina’s 10-year statute of repose.  A statute of repose is unlike a statute of limitations, which usually begins when an injury is recognized.  As Justice Kennedy wrote in the opinion, “[a] statute of repose can prohibit a cause of action from coming into existence.”  Connecticut, Kansas, and Oregon have similar laws to the North Carolina law at issue in this case. 

 This case makes it clear that it is important to act quickly if you have unfortunately been impacted by contamination. The Toxic injury Lawyers are well versed in New Jersey and New York filing constraints, such as the statute of limitations for these states. If you believe you’ve been impacted by a contamination, contact us to schedule a free consultation to discuss the situation and your options.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Attorneys
What clients are saying about us
  • "I highly recommend this law firm because they were responsive and sensitive to my needs and won. I chose this firm after having talked to 6 other firms because within minutes of contacting them I was able to speak to Mr. Lieberman himself. Mr. Lieberman and the junior attorneys did not make me feel small just because I am an individual, a mother, and not a big corporation. My phone calls & emails were returned promptly. They listened to exactly what I wanted & delivered. The defendant was nasty and ignored us and at times I felt like this was going nowhere. The attorneys worked well to reach a settlement that exceeded my expectations. Mr. Lieberman is a very seasoned lawyer who has compassion for his clients. The best thing about Mr. Lieberman is that he trains his staff to have that same level of compassion and respect for clients. " - Z.B., Jersey City, NJ

  • "I would like to personally thank Lieberman & Blecher for their help and advice to my family in dealing with an environmental cleanup issue. When it is a big company and their legal team against a small property owner, I have learned that you need an expert to protect your property and your rights. The team at Lieberman & Blecher did this for my family in a professional and cost effective manner. I would certainly recommend this firm to anyone in need of legal assistance" - C.K., Woodbridge, NJ

Contact The Toxic Injury Lawyers

Quick Contact Form